Author Topic: Perdan vs Caligus and Company  (Read 63809 times)

Eduardo Almighty

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 787
    • View Profile
Re: Perdan vs Caligus and Company
« Reply #120: December 18, 2013, 04:10:38 PM »
People are so interested in trying to divide Sirion into new realms that's no matter who has to be destroyed in the process. Obviously, these same people who think that would be more fun to create new realms in Sirion has a very limited vision of their own experiences, saying that this is the best scenario for the development of the game when it's a bunch of bull!@#$. These new realms are nothing more than a distraction to Perdan, who eventually will turn in them, not to make the game more fun to the players, but certainly more fun for the people in Perdan and just it. They are realms without history and without possibility to make a history - they will disappear in no time to give the place to another dull realm intended for the same purpose: to ensure the fun of a small group at the expense of a larger group.

Why did the same in Sirion while the people are having fun with what we have!? Why create a lot of client estates just to turn on them and to secure the fun just to the small group of always the same people!? It's a problem when the wars in game begin to be justified by unilateral visions of players that think their solutions are the best solutions for an entire continent. Even aligning the entire south and even bringing the war to Sirion, taking some regions and forming new kingdoms, this is just a small cycle because Sirion will eventually return and retake these lands, or Perdan managed to convince all players in EC that their way of playing is the best for everyone!? If that is the truth, then the continent is already dead.

In the end, people will seek Sirion or the south, following their right to play the game as they want without the intervention of people that think this or that way is the best to save EC while we continue losing players instead of attract new ones. Then, instead of saying that this way is better for the game, let's be honest and say that this is the best scenario for Perdan. If the players in the north had the same thought, revolts, rebellions and other aspects of the game would have dictated changes. Perdan will not dictate this changes here nor its players will bring changes to the northern mindset.

It can be fun for five or six players, but for everyone!? Pfff... it's best to seek another continent to play than follow what a small portion of players think what is best for EC. The difference now among Sirion and Perdan is that we don't try to govern the entire continent and impose our way to play the game as the only way to play Battlemaster nor we try to impose our vision as the only vision to save the game. This is what happen when the wars in game are just a mirror of the wishes of a group of players and OOC intentions to bring new life in this or that continent.
Now with the Skovgaard Family... and it's gone.
Serpentis again!