Anaris: Might I strongly encourage the devs to make a public announcement continent-wide to inform everyone of the monster behavior tweak, so that those expansionnist low-density realms might expect a little better what'S coming for them.
Would it also be possible to know what density is being targetted as far as the monster spawns go? Under which treshhold do the monsters massively spawn?
Beldragos: That was a list of realms, it did not include the specific number for each named realms. Yes, in Madina's case, it was, mostly, the annexation of Candiel Fields. That one is a recent addition. Of the realms that have expanded, Madina did the least so. But on the other hand, when's the last time Madina declared war on someone? Had you invaded Luria while they were weak, you wouldn't have those rogues on your back today. Madina might not have gone on the wildest expansionist streak, but its passivity is also part of the reason why density is so low overall. Madina could have been removed from the map RL years ago, and things wouldn't be any different today.
D'Hara on the other hand took, on top of the western regions, many regions in the east which had not historically been theirs. Luria and Fissoa have reclaimed historical territories, but it doesn't change much to the fact that they didn't really have the densities for them anyways.
Avernus and Luria are those that *took* the most regions, but Luria also gained a ton of nobles since they lost those regions.
