Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't feel this is a realm merger for the simple fact that the nobles of Terran aren't going to be part of D'hara. Even with those that switched over aren't going to stay long. The fact that we aren't staying makes it a non merger. Alaster is a die hard Astroist. He serves the church before the realm.
My other case should have no bearing on this one as the situations aren't related.
You are correct on the technical aspects of this statement, but you are missing what I believe to be the intent of the rule. It is intended to prevent realms from peacefully agreeing to band together to form superpowers, as this stifles conflict. If two realms have been at war and one of them is eventually beaten down and surrenders, it is acceptable for that realm to agree to terms that involve its regions being transferred away, within the limits of game mechanics. It's the two realms at peace merging together that we're trying to prevent. You can point out that Tara and Coria are at peace, but the important element in this case is that Coria has been effectively destroyed; with no capital, the realm is doomed. Its nobles cannot recruit or cash bonds, and its regions are slowly going rogue with no capital support. Their decision as a defeated realm to join Tara is acceptable within the spirit of the realm merger rule, or at least that is my interpretation.
Seeing as I'm rather close to this case (being a noble of Silnaria) I will recuse myself from voting on the outcome.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but based on my interactions with the player I would assume Ebglish isn't his first language. Its pretty solid but there are some gaps, and this may be one.
Well, the statement is obviously poorly chosen. A warning would seem to be in order. Next time, ask "How do I report cheating?", not "Hey, that's guy's cheating, can someone report him?"
I suspect that scrolls can't be used while traveling, so likely the Falks. And yea, magic fizzling does make one think of Mendicant's magic being dispelled.
Also, I've come to conclude that every untasteful person deserves to be called a Saxon. It should become a synonym for rude, uncivilized, dishonorable.
I like this, and perhaps the little BM world icon could have variants with different types of windows. Like a worldCircle/scroll icon or a worldCircle/map icon for scribe reports and world maps respectively.
Perhaps when writing letters there could be an indication of the recipient in the tab name.
Apparently not. Either that or they have self-respect. Hard to say.
Need I be an !@#$%^& every time?
I'm not really involved in BT affairs right now, and despite expecting Thalmarkin to win, I did not expect it this way.
Also, if the player wants to come back with a new account, no one is stopping him.
There has been few occasions where accused people could prove themselves. They got their accounts unlocked in less than a week. If the player of Soulja family can prove himself innocent, he will get his account back.
Removes barriers to entry.
I understand the desire for new players to talk, and I share it. However, if you force them to talk before they can actually do anything, and get a feel for whether this is a game they'll enjoy playing, you're much more likely to scare away people who might like it, but are shy, than you are to encourage people to talk.
There are actually plans to have new players choose a vacant estate to start out in. This would generally ensure that the family home is in a region with enough population to support multiple knights, and certainly give players much more control over their initial placement in general.
