Do I really have to even dignify that with a response?
Of course it doesn't. I didn't say it did and neither did Chénier. Yes, it's a somewhat unpleasant implication, but if that was all you objected to, you could just as easily have responded to Chénier with something like, "Asylon are not cheaters. None of us knew that Aurvandil held cheaters, and allying with them doesn't make us cheaters any more than being allied with Irombrozia back in the day makes you a cheater because Twinblade had multis there." (Actually, you might not have been able to come up with the Irombrozia reference off the top of your head, but kudos to you if you could! 
)
The point is, not a single thing Chénier said was false, so repeatedly calling him a liar makes you sound a bit crazy.
What he did was insult you, and one of the best ways to respond to guilt-by-association insults is to calmly and rationally show how obviously faulty they are.
I never even said that Asylon was guilty by association. Any association to Aurvandil is to demonstrate Asylon's own hypocritical double-standards as to what is fine and what isn't. Obvious cheaters were glorified, while a coalition of small struggling realms was vilified. All with a discourse of large realms being bad (Asylon and Aurvandil both being large realms) and small realms (like those Aurvandil and Asylon attacked) are good.
I was rather commenting the fact that Glaumring likes to villify SA by saying how unfun the bloc is and how it ruins Dwi, or just about. That you were once a member of it doesn't contradict this statement in any way. And yet, the only people SA bores is its own, and the only outsiders they bother are those who go out of their way to stir up trouble with them. If Asylon couldn't become friends with Terran, with D'Hara, with Kabrinskia, or with Astrum... ever thought that maybe that just goes to say a lot more about Asylon than any of these other realms?
And yea, my one dwi character is flexible when it comes to diplomacy. Should I be ashamed of this? Unlike you, I am not the same as my characters. I also played a dude who thought it was totally cool to rip the hearts out of living victims. Do you believe I seriously think we should do more of this IRL to please the gods? Machiavel walks his path. If you walk in the same direction, he'll walk with you regardless of what he thinks of you (for most cases). Walk a different path, and he'll let you walk it alone regardless of prior relations. Doesn't mean he's honorless or that he'll ditch allies for no reason. Just means you can't make him do things he didn't already plan to do.
But really, all I had said for you to call me a troll is that you should have considered your relations with Caerwyn to, just maybe, have impacts on your relations with others? Caerwyn had sympathizers abroad, and you obviously never considered that pissing off Caerwyn could also result in pissing off their sympathizers. Just as you apparently can't comprehend how your relations with Fiorenza and Aurvandil screwed Asylon's relations with others like Astum and Corsanctum... You play the poor underdog that was forced into isolation by mean bullies next to you, but Asylon is a realm nobody really cares about that dug its own hole to isolate itself in. And I find your self-victimization to be quite tiring.
