Lurian News

[Adriddae]

Oh no! Amaury jumped off a cliff!

Rage quit!  ;D

[Arundel]

Rage quit!  ;D

"All that was left of him was his trademark maroon cape. Sebastian immediately sent men down to scour the area for his body, but the waves would have claimed it long before they reached the water. And as if the gods had taken him themselves, so did Amaury Capet vanish off the face of the earth..."

Or did he?  ;)

[Chenier]

Still do not agree with pausing and unpausing in the future simply because Luria plans to ban you...

You *can* ban a paused character.

[Shizzle]

Why would you have to drop them as militia?

If I bring them into LN without any treaty, won't they attack? No passage rights. Though I've never gone on such a diplo mission with a non-ally.

[D`Este]

Not when we sign peace first.

[De-Legro]

If I bring them into LN without any treaty, won't they attack? No passage rights. Though I've never gone on such a diplo mission with a non-ally.

Are passage rights even properly implemented yet?

[Indirik]

Still do not agree with pausing and unpausing in the future simply because Luria plans to ban you...

Paused nobles can be banned.

[Indirik]

Are passage rights even properly implemented yet?

No. None of the treaties have any game mechanics effects.

[Sacha]

Still do not agree with pausing and unpausing in the future simply because Luria plans to ban you...

And what's the difference between this and leaving/returning?

[Ramiel]

And what's the difference between this and leaving/returning?

A great deal. Someone leaving to go off to SA again or w/e is at least taking their punishments as proscribed or whatever, unlike say what Tim did with Alanna.

Dont get me wrong, I love the RP behind it, but the game mechanics being used which directly mean someone cannot take action against you just... well its the very much like Alanna still being a Royal and untouchable... Its not good roleplay in a mechanics point of sense.

[Chenier]

A great deal. Someone leaving to go off to SA again or w/e is at least taking their punishments as proscribed or whatever, unlike say what Tim did with Alanna.

Dont get me wrong, I love the RP behind it, but the game mechanics being used which directly mean someone cannot take action against you just... well its the very much like Alanna still being a Royal and untouchable... Its not good roleplay in a mechanics point of sense.

2011-08-23      Alanna      Joined the realm of (rogue)
2011-08-23      Alanna      Banned from Pian en Luries by Koli.
Reason: Leader of a failed rebellion

She was banned. And she's not paused. I don't get what you are trying to say.

[Ramiel]

2011-08-23      Alanna      Joined the realm of (rogue)
2011-08-23      Alanna      Banned from Pian en Luries by Koli.
Reason: Leader of a failed rebellion

She was banned. And she's not paused. I don't get what you are trying to say.

This was this time after she tried a rebellion. What I was talking about was when Alanna was paused because Tim heard OOC on IRC or something about the rebellion that was to happen that very day that would have won and thus lost her royal status, which following my other post would mean ban and possible execution (which is what was at least talked about). IE the character would not have been able to lead a rebellion because she wouldnt have even been allowed in PeL/LN.

[Anaris]

This was this time after she tried a rebellion. What I was talking about was when Alanna was paused because Tim heard OOC on IRC or something about the rebellion that was to happen that very day that would have won and thus lost her royal status, which following my other post would mean ban and possible execution (which is what was at least talked about). IE the character would not have been able to lead a rebellion because she wouldnt have even been allowed in PeL/LN.

To be clear, royal status never crossed my mind when I paused her.  I wasn't exactly thinking in a cold and calculated manner.

I paused because I couldn't deal with the stress of yet another fight there.

Later on, when I calmed down some, I expected Askileon to join Luria Nova, and Pian en Luries to be a pathetic shell of itself, soon to fall as Poryatown starved.

After that plan was scotched, I expected to have Alanna make a lot of noise in a very short time, then run off to the north and attempt to get together an army to take back her throne. (Which was about as likely as the rebellion succeeding)

It wasn't until after I unpaused her and Matt mentioned it to me that I even realized Alanna was still a royal.

[Ramiel]

To be clear, royal status never crossed my mind when I paused her.  I wasn't exactly thinking in a cold and calculated manner.

I paused because I couldn't deal with the stress of yet another fight there.

Later on, when I calmed down some, I expected Askileon to join Luria Nova, and Pian en Luries to be a pathetic shell of itself, soon to fall as Poryatown starved.

After that plan was scotched, I expected to have Alanna make a lot of noise in a very short time, then run off to the north and attempt to get together an army to take back her throne. (Which was about as likely as the rebellion succeeding)

It wasn't until after I unpaused her and Matt mentioned it to me that I even realized Alanna was still a royal.

Right right. Err I didnt mean it quite like I put it, sorry!

[Sacha]

A great deal. Someone leaving to go off to SA again or w/e is at least taking their punishments as proscribed or whatever, unlike say what Tim did with Alanna.

Dont get me wrong, I love the RP behind it, but the game mechanics being used which directly mean someone cannot take action against you just... well its the very much like Alanna still being a Royal and untouchable... Its not good roleplay in a mechanics point of sense.

I'm fairly sure even paused nobles can be banned. And even if they can't, then they can be banned the instant they return.