What, exactly, is wrong with the reasoning of my post? Or do you mean to say that it's 'wrong' in some sort of abstract, philosophical sense, such as that it's an unprecedented breach of internet social protocols and therefore immoral.
It's not abstract or philosophical, it's hilariously masturbatory. I don't know how you can expect people to take it seriously when you talk like that. You're obviously not a thinking man if you don't even know how to build up credibility. Aristotlean artistic proofs, much? Or maybe your time's too caught up, as an educated gentleman, being an internet sophist to learn about how to actually persuade people. Or at least not come off as a jerkass over two sentences.
Also it's a not a breach of "internet social protocols" (lol), it's a breach of... basic human interaction?
