Point the finger and tell us who to kill. Either the sage's innocent kills an unknown who's giving tells or the sage tells us to kill the guy he investigated and found guilty.
But... wouldn't that mean that the assassin's would be smart to
not kill the guy "leading"? Because he's either not the sage, or he's protected by the angel. But then since the assassins won't want to kill the lead guy, then it makes no sense to protect him, or to not have the sage lead the charge... But diplos
have to plan in public... so they can't really hide their intentions...
Damn. This is going to tie my brain in knots...
I think I'm going to need some Excedrin before this turn is even half done.
