What would this have really achieved?
Well, Hammarsett wouldn't be on the verge of extinction, because Tara and Coria were, well, hammering on them. This would let the north focus more on Tara, and expanding Hammarsett to make them a viable realm.
Or we would have to march over the mountains, something we could still do now but don't, obviously, because it doesn't work.
If Coria didn't exist, we wouldn't have to march through the mountains. We could have gone right through Barad Falas to hit Tara's northern regions. And possibly linking with Carelia for joint attacks. Again, allowing Hamamrsett to expand.
How is destroying Coria IN ANY WAY a better strategy than neutralizing Talerium?
I didn't say it
was better. It was just more realistic, and more likely to happen. Darka has made clear from the start of the war, and probably before, that they would
not attack Talerium. Good/bad doesn't matter. It just wasn't going to happen. And that's really what sticks in the craw of many people. Eston knew, or should have known if they were paying attention, that Darka simply
would not attack Talerium under any circumstances. It's been Darka's policy for years. But Eston ignored that, and tried to force the northern alliance down a path that one of the largest members of it refused to follow.
Would Darka attacking Talerium have more sense from a pure strategic standpoint? Sure. If you completely ignore years of political history, and the people involved. But you just can't do that. Everyone who had been paying attention
knew that Darka would not attack Talerium. Eston apparently wasn't paying attention, because they tried to force the issue, and it backfired. And it's going to cost the northern alliance a lot.
And no, all the blame won't fall on Eston for it, either. Darka share's some of the blame, too. As do MI and Hammaresett, who can't seem to learn to cooperate. Grr...