Hum, ok, It is never OK to tell another player to go !@#$ himself. But, and all other cases?
What I am asking is to see all cases together, under other perspective, trying to find flaws on all cases because those were the reason this last one occur. And not asking to change the verdict. Its done its done, I accept it, but if you affirm this will be used as precedent than I am worried.
I understand - and agree - when you say this verdict is right. If there where no other cases, if there where no antecedents, I wouldn't say anything. But it is not the case. The other cases had important significance in this verdict. Or not?