..Or not.
Well then, the answer to your question is obvious. Aurvandil went to war with Madina, whom were members of the moot.
False. Madina were
enemies of the Moot.
Madina is no longer with us. The moot didn't really help them.
No. We hurt them. Because we didn't like them at all. They tried to conquer Paisly, and didn't finally formally relinquish claim until very late in the affair. Barca lent you Evanburg (a fact Aurvandil has dishonorably ignored), while, after Madina pillaged Candiels for the first time, back when Aurvandil was weak, Hireshmont went to Madina and threatened to bring an army to besiege Madina City if the pirates didn't back off and work for peace. We secured a brief peace, which was eventually abandoned when we had other things to be doing. We eventually soured on Aurvandil because of how wretchedly rude and uncouth your nobles were in every interaction, and how expansionistic and aggressive you became. But for quite a while, we were actively intervening on your side: and that was when you were weak, not the Aurvandil of today that anybody would like to have as an ally.
It's amazing how short the institutional memory of Aurvandil is. You'd think a monarchy would do a better job remembering its friends.
Aurvandil went to war with Barca, whom were members of the moot, the moot doesn't seem to be helping them.
Let's be clear: it's been less than a week since you hit Barca. Even
if we wanted to march down, guns a-blazin', for a full-bore war... we'd still be marching now, based on where your armies were. You make hasty conclusions based on insufficient evidence.